Articles

WHO report targets safer urban food environments

A new WHO background document explains how cities can improve access to safer, healthier food through procurement, planning, labelling and retail policies.

A fruit and vegetable market in the Maldives, illustrating the urban food environment discussed by WHO.
WHO/V. Gupta-Smith

By Noah Mercier

Published July 1, 2026

The World Health Organization has published a new 24-page background document examining how urban food environments shape what people can access, buy and eat. The report, Supporting healthy diets and safe foods in urban food environments, places food safety alongside nutrition, public health and city planning.

Its central message is practical: safer and healthier eating is influenced by more than individual choices. The location of shops and markets, the food sold near homes and schools, the growth of digital food delivery and the increasing availability of highly processed products can all affect public health. WHO says these conditions contribute to several overlapping challenges, including malnutrition in all its forms, diet-related noncommunicable diseases and foodborne illness.

Why cities are part of the food-safety conversation

Urbanization is changing how food reaches consumers. In many cities, people rely on a mixture of supermarkets, informal markets, restaurants, takeaway outlets and delivery platforms. That makes the food environment more convenient, but it also means that safety and nutrition depend on decisions made by many actors, from local authorities and retailers to food businesses and delivery services.

The WHO document also highlights inequality. Access to fresh, nutritious food is not the same in every neighbourhood, and household budgets, transport, time and digital access can affect the choices available to people. A policy that improves food safety or nutrition in one part of a city may therefore have less impact if other communities cannot reach the same shops, markets or services.

The policy tools WHO is highlighting

The document presents evidence-informed options for local governments rather than introducing a new consumer rule. Among the approaches it discusses are healthier public food procurement and food-service policies, land-use planning and zoning, regulation of food marketing, clearer nutrition and food-safety labelling, support for healthier food retail and markets, and measures that improve access to fresh foods.

Public procurement can influence what is served in schools, hospitals and other institutions. Planning and zoning can affect which types of food businesses operate near residential areas or public facilities. Marketing rules can help shape the messages people see, especially children and other groups who may be more vulnerable to aggressive promotion. Labelling can support informed decisions, while better retail and market policies can make safer and more nutritious options easier to find.

WHO also connects these measures with emergency preparedness and the Healthy Cities approach. That matters because food systems can be disrupted by outbreaks, extreme weather, supply problems or other emergencies. Building safer food environments into routine city planning can help authorities respond more consistently when conditions change.

What this means for everyday cooking

The report is written for policymakers, not as a replacement for household food-safety guidance. It does not declare a particular ingredient, supermarket or delivery service unsafe, and it does not set new cooking temperatures or storage times.

For home cooks, its useful takeaway is that food safety begins before an ingredient reaches the kitchen. Availability, labelling and the conditions in which food is sold all influence the starting point for a meal. Once food is at home, ordinary safe-handling habits remain important: keep perishable foods chilled, prevent raw ingredients from contacting ready-to-eat food, and follow the use-by or storage information supplied with the product.

The same principle applies to prepared food bought through delivery platforms. Convenience does not remove the need to pay attention to ingredient information, allergen details, storage instructions or the condition of chilled food when it arrives. The WHO publication identifies digital food delivery as part of the changing food environment, but it does not endorse a particular platform or make a product-specific safety claim.

A framework for local action

Rather than offering a single prescription, WHO describes a framework that cities can adapt to their own circumstances. The document includes examples from cities around the world and links healthier food access with food safety, fairness, resilience and sustainability. That broader approach is relevant to cooking because the quality of a meal depends not only on a recipe, but also on whether safe and nutritious ingredients are realistically available.

The publication is best read as a policy update with practical consequences for the way cities design food systems. It asks local authorities to consider markets, public services, retail, advertising and delivery as connected parts of the same environment. For consumers, the immediate message is modest but important: safer food choices are easier when the places where people shop and eat are designed to support them.

Read the full WHO background document for the evidence and policy options described by the organization.

Official sources


Sources

  • Official source 1
  • https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/B09723